Popunder ads open a landing page in a separate browser window or tab behind the page the user is viewing. Affiliate marketers use the format to buy large volumes of low-cost traffic across iGaming, dating, adult, utilities, sweepstakes, nutra, and other performance-driven verticals. The networks below are compared by GEO coverage, pricing, minimum deposit, targeting, source-level controls, vertical fit, and moderation flexibility for restricted and gray-hat campaigns.
| # | Network | Since | Pricing models | GEOs | Best for verticals | Minimum deposit | Special features | More |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
ReachEffect
|
2014 |
CPM CPC CPA CPL |
250 |
Ecommerce Nutra Adult Gambling Dating Sweepstakes |
$100 |
API automation 20% cashback on first deposit from $500 |
|
| 2 |
Kadam
|
2012 |
CPM CPC |
195 |
Gambling Nutra Betting Dating Crypto Sweeps |
$100 |
Microbidding CPA target |
|
| 3 |
Clickaine
|
2016 |
CPC CPM |
195 |
Betting Gambling Nutra Dating Ecommerce Software Crypto Adult offers |
$20 |
Smart CPC Smart CPM |
|
| 4 |
Remoby
|
2021 |
Fixed CPC Fixed CPM SmartCPM |
195+ |
iGaming Social Apps Financial Giveaways |
$100 |
Audience intent targeting iGaming whitelists |
|
| 5 |
MyBid
|
2020 |
CPM CPC CPA |
120+ |
Dating VPN Utilities Gambling Betting |
$100 |
No content or GEO restrictions |
|
| 6 |
AdsCompass
|
2013 |
CPM CPC |
200+ |
Gambling Betting Dating Software |
$50 |
SST Pixel S2S Postback |
|
| 7 |
OctoClick
|
2018 |
CPM CPC |
120+ |
Dating Gambling Betting adult-oriented Nutra Adult |
$20 |
n/a |
|
| 8 |
PropellerAds
|
2011 |
CPM CPC |
195 |
Finance Ecommerce Mobile Apps Utilities Software Social niches |
$100 |
SmartCPC SmartCPM CPA Goal |
|
| 9 |
Adsterra
|
2013 |
CPM CPC CPA CPL CPI |
248 |
iGaming eSports VPN Utilities, Mobile Apps Dating Ecommerce Subscriptions Browser Extensions |
$100 |
Custom Bid Social Bar format CPA Goal Smart CPM |
|
| 10 |
Hilltop Ads
|
2013 |
CPM CPC |
Worldwide |
Dating Gambling Streaming Dates OnlyFans Games Mobile Apps VPN Pin-Submit Ecommerce |
$50 |
n/a |
|
| 11 |
PopAds
|
2010 |
CPV |
n/a |
Adult |
$10 |
Helps avoid AdBlock |
Best Popunder Ad Networks by Use Case
Different Popunder networks tend to perform better in different verticals. The picks below are based on real campaign results.
Best for iGaming: Kadam
Kadam stands out for iGaming in Africa. In an Egypt-focused Android campaign using adult placements, $6,515.46 in spend generated 309 FTDs at an average CPA of $21.09 and a 324% ROI.
Best for Adult: Clickaine
Clickaine is a particularly good fit for adult campaigns where profitability depends heavily on source-level filtering and bid adjustments. An Adult Smartlink campaign across 12 Tier-1 GEOs started unprofitably, but publisher and zone whitelisting, GEO optimization, bid changes, and frequency-cap adjustments pushed it to a 75.48% ROI. Total spend was $862, with $1,512 in revenue.
Best for Dating: HilltopAds
HilltopAds is well suited to dating campaigns that rely on mobile Popunder traffic and automated zone-level optimization. A Swedish Android SOI campaign spent $489.49, generated 259 conversions and $1,036 in revenue, and finished at 111.65% ROI. Poor-performing zones were filtered out automatically, which is useful when scaling a campaign across mixed inventory.
Best for Utilities: Adsterra
Adsterra is a strong option for utility offers that benefit from placement-level bid control and blacklist-based optimization. A Brazilian Android antivirus campaign spent $74.79, generated $182.82 in revenue and $108.03 in profit, producing a 144% ROI. The campaign was optimized through custom bids and placement blacklisting.
Best for Gaming: PropellerAds
PropellerAds is worth considering for mobile gaming campaigns that use automated optimization. A US Android gaming campaign running Popunder with CPA Goal and S2S tracking reached a 5.5% conversion rate in under two weeks.
How We Rank Popunder Ad Networks
We rank popunder ad networks from an affiliate marketer’s perspective, focusing on GEO coverage, pricing, targeting, source-level control, optimization tools, and vertical fit.
For pop traffic, raw volume matters less than how easily advertisers can isolate and manage individual placements. We therefore look at source or zone IDs, whitelists and blacklists, bid adjustments, frequency caps, S2S postback, and the availability of direct versus resold inventory where this information is disclosed.
We also consider moderation flexibility for gambling, dating, adult, crypto, nutra, sweepstakes, and other restricted or gray-hat verticals, including rules around aggressive prelanders, redirects, and non-mainstream creatives. A larger network does not automatically rank higher if it gives advertisers less control over the traffic.
How to Choose a Popunder Ad Network
Choose a popunder ad network based on the offer, GEO, budget, and how you plan to scale. A network with huge global volume may still be a poor fit if it lacks enough usable inventory for your vertical or target market.
For small tests, prioritize a low minimum deposit and enough source-level control to exclude weak placements early. For larger campaigns, source-specific bidding, automated optimization, and sufficient inventory in the target GEOs become more important.
For restricted or gray-hat verticals, check moderation before depositing. Gambling, dating, adult, crypto, nutra, and sweepstakes offers may rely on aggressive prelanders, advertorial-style funnels, redirects, or creatives that are not accepted everywhere. Make sure the network allows the elements your funnel depends on without requiring substantial changes just to pass moderation.
If you optimize toward CPA, reliable postback support and tracker compatibility should also be part of the selection criteria.

Traffic Quality, Targeting and CPM
A low CPM does not automatically mean cheap traffic. In popunder campaigns, performance depends heavily on the placement, GEO, device mix, and how well the inventory matches the offer.
Two sources inside the same network can behave very differently: one may deliver cheap volume but weak downstream actions, while another costs more per thousand impressions and still produces a lower CPA. This is why source-level performance matters more than network-wide averages.
Targeting is useful when it helps separate segments with materially different conversion behavior. Device, OS, carrier, browser, connection type, and dayparting can all affect campaign economics.
For gray-hat and restricted verticals, traffic quality is highly contextual. Adult, iGaming, dating, crypto, nutra, and sweepstakes campaigns may perform well on inventory that is poorly suited to mainstream offers. In these cases, vertical fit matters more than broad labels such as “premium traffic.”
CPM is only the entry cost.

Frequency Caps and Fraud Filtering
Frequency caps are especially important with popunder traffic because repeated exposure can quickly reduce efficiency. Showing the same offer too often to the same user may increase spend without adding meaningful reach. Caps should be tested by GEO, device, offer type, and conversion cycle.
Fraud filtering matters because popunder campaigns often run across large volumes of mixed inventory. Weak or suspicious sources can inflate impressions or clicks, lower conversion rates, and consume budget without producing downstream actions.
Watch for abnormal patterns such as unusually high click activity, very short sessions, repeated conversions from the same source, or placements that generate volume without meaningful funnel progression. For gray-hat and restricted verticals, non-mainstream inventory should not be rejected automatically. The goal is to separate unusual sources that still convert from traffic that simply wastes budget.
Use the network’s anti-fraud filters as the first layer, then validate traffic quality at source level in your own tracker.

FAQ
Yes. Popunder traffic is widely used in iGaming, dating, adult, crypto, nutra, sweepstakes, and other restricted verticals. The main advantages are access to non-mainstream inventory, flexible funnel options, and fewer limitations than on many mainstream platforms.
Often, yes. Popunder users usually have little prior intent, so a prelander can introduce the offer and improve the transition to a registration, deposit, install, or purchase page. Direct linking can still work for simple funnels and should be tested separately.
Neither is universally better. Mainstream inventory may provide broader reach, while adult or other non-mainstream placements can be a better fit for aggressive dating and iGaming funnels. Test them separately because CPA, FTD rate, and subscription rate can differ sharply.
It varies by network, GEO, vertical, and inventory type. Aggressive prelanders, advertorials, redirects, branding, and creative claims may be accepted on one platform and rejected on another. Check both creative and landing-page rules before launching.
Base the test budget on the target CPA or offer payout, not on a fixed amount. The budget should be large enough to generate several meaningful downstream events before sources are judged.
Do not blacklist a source after only a few visits. Exclude it when enough data shows that it consistently spends above the target CPA or produces volume without meaningful downstream conversions.

