Native ad networks differ in publisher inventory, GEO coverage, pricing models, and campaign controls. This list focuses on networks for affiliate media buyers running Gambling, Betting, Nutra, Dating, and other performance campaigns.
The table below compares pricing models, minimum deposits, supported verticals, and optimization features to help advertisers choose a network for their offer, target GEO, and testing budget.
| # | Network | Native pricing | GEOs | Best for verticals | Minimum deposit | Native campaign features | More |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
ReachEffect
|
CPC |
195 |
Gambling Finance Gaming VOD |
$30 via PayPal $50 otherwise |
Source ID targeting per-widget optimization frequency capping |
|
| 2 |
Kadam
|
CPM CPC |
200 |
Gambling Dating Nutra Finance Ecommerce Sweepstakes |
$100 $500/€500 via bank transfer |
Traffic Forecaster site filters placement-level bids |
|
| 3 |
Clickaine
|
CPC |
195 |
Gambling Betting Dating Utilities Quizzes Subscriptions |
$20 |
Smart Bidding publisher filters retargeting S2S tracking |
|
| 4 |
AdsCompass
|
CPM |
200 |
Adult Dating |
$50 |
Source ID bidding blacklists/whitelists SST Pixel S2S tracking |
|
| 5 |
MyBid
|
CPC |
120 |
Dating VPN Utilities Gambling Betting |
$100 |
CPA Goal source and spot filters conversion tracking automated rules |
|
| 6 |
OctoClick
|
CPM CPC |
120 |
Crypto Dating Finance Nutra Gambling Sweepstakes |
$20 |
Frequency capping GEO, OS and browser targeting pre-landers |
|
| 7 |
RichAds
|
CPC |
220 |
Gambling Dating |
$150 |
Predictor Micro Bidding Automated Rules |
How We Compiled This Native Ad Network List
We selected platforms offering native placements and compared their GEO coverage, pricing models, minimum deposits, targeting options, and optimization tools. We also reviewed advertising policies affecting affiliate campaigns in Gambling, Betting, Nutra, Dating, and Crypto. Our comparison draws on platform documentation, published advertising conditions, and available information about campaign features, with a focus on suitability for specific offers, GEOs, and testing budgets.
Which Native Ad Network Should You Choose?
For Finance, Gaming, and VOD offers, ReachEffect is worth considering. Its native platform offers CPC buying and source ID targeting, with a minimum deposit of $30 via PayPal or $50 via other payment methods.
For automated source management, RichAds offers Micro Bidding and Automated Rules to adjust bids and manage blacklists and whitelists. MyBid offers CPA Goal for native campaigns, automatically adjusting CPC bids toward a target acquisition cost while charging advertisers for clicks.
For native testing with a low entry deposit, Clickaine and OctoClick both accept deposits from $20. Clickaine supports CPC and Smart Bidding for native ads, while OctoClick offers both CPC and CPM. OctoClick also lists Crypto, Dating, Nutra, and Gambling among the verticals suitable for its native format and mentions support for pre-landers.
For manual placement optimization, Kadam is worth considering. Its 2025 native Adult Dating case study describes a campaign targeting Android users in Germany. The advertiser tested 47 creatives, monitored site-level CPA, and adjusted bids on underperforming placements, reporting over 65% ROI across a campaign lasting more than four months. These results are specific to that campaign. For source-level conversion tracking, AdsCompass supports S2S postbacks and zone-level identifiers, including integrations with Keitaro and Binom. These tools let advertisers compare acquisition costs across placements and use the results to adjust bids or exclude sources.
What to Look for in a Native Ad Network
Native Ad Formats and Publisher Inventory
Native networks differ in their inventory, from in-feed placements to content recommendation widgets. Alongside placement type, publisher-level reporting is an important factor when comparing networks. Site and placement IDs, conversion statistics, and blacklist/whitelist controls help identify sources that generate clicks without profitable actions.
Large discrepancies between reported clicks and tracker sessions or unusually high numbers of repeated clicks may indicate tracking issues or low-quality traffic. These patterns warrant investigation before increasing campaign budgets.
GEO Coverage and Targeting Options
A network’s advertised GEO coverage does not indicate how much native traffic is available for a specific campaign. For example, targeting Brazil, Android devices, and a particular mobile carrier may leave substantially less inventory than the platform’s overall traffic figures suggest.
Where available, compare native-only traffic estimates after applying campaign filters. If the platform does not provide forecasts, request an inventory estimate from its account manager. Combined figures for native, push, and popunder traffic can overstate the reach available for native campaigns.


Both tools provide native traffic data for Brazil on Android mobile devices before registration or funding. ReachEffect shows daily impressions and minimum, average, and top CPC bids. OctoClick shows impressions, unique visitors, and average CPM for the last 24 hours. ReachEffect provides more detail for setting a CPC bid, while OctoClick adds audience reach data. The displayed CPC and CPM figures cannot be compared directly.
Supported Verticals and Advertising Restrictions
Gambling, Betting, Nutra, Dating, and Crypto offers often face additional restrictions. A network may support casino advertising but reject certain bonus promotions or require licenses in specific GEOs. Nutra campaigns making treatment or weight-loss claims may face additional restrictions on creatives and advertorials. Acceptance of a vertical does not guarantee approval of every offer within it.
For advertorial funnels, moderation can cover the entire chain: creative, pre-lander, and final landing page. Kadam’s moderation guidelines explain that approved ads may receive tags restricting access to certain publishers. External traffic partners can also reject materials already approved by the network, reducing available inventory.
Tracking and Campaign Optimization
For CPA campaigns, source-level conversion data helps distinguish cheap leads from profitable traffic. Consider a hypothetical Gambling campaign with two placements, each spending $100. Publisher A generates 40 registrations and one FTD, while Publisher B delivers 15 registrations and four FTDs. Their costs per FTD are $100 and $25, respectively.
Tracking separate conversion events reveals these differences. Publisher-level bid adjustments can also preserve potentially profitable traffic without immediately blacklisting a source. For example, RichAds describes using Micro Bidding to reduce a publisher’s CPC bid by 20% rather than excluding it entirely. This approach allows advertisers to continue testing the source at a lower cost.
Native Advertising Costs and Minimum Deposits
Native traffic costs vary by GEO, publisher quality, placement type, and bidding competition. CPCs and CPMs can differ substantially between premium editorial placements and mass-market recommendation widgets, while narrower targeting can limit available inventory. Under CPM, a higher creative CTR can reduce the effective CPC, but advertisers still pay for impressions that generate no clicks.
Minimum deposits should not determine the testing budget. A $20 deposit may be enough to launch a campaign but insufficient to collect meaningful conversion data, especially when the expected CPA exceeds that amount.
Consider a hypothetical Gambling campaign with a $0.05 CPC, a 2% click-to-registration rate, and a 5% registration-to-FTD (first-time deposit) rate. A $100 spend would generate approximately 2,000 clicks, 40 registrations, and an expected two FTDs, resulting in a $50 cost per FTD. With a $60 CPA payout, that leaves $20 in campaign profit before other expenses. At a $40 payout, the campaign loses $20. However, an expected two FTDs provide too little data to establish a reliable long-term CPA.
The same principle applies to other affiliate models. For COD Nutra, account for lead approval and confirmed sales; for Dating, calculate costs against the payable SOI, DOI, or subscription event. For Gambling RevShare offers, profitability depends on player value over time rather than a fixed FTD payout.
FAQ
Yes, some native ad networks support CPA-based optimization. For example, MyBid offers CPA Goal for native campaigns, adjusting CPC bids toward a target acquisition cost. Advertisers still pay for clicks rather than exclusively for confirmed conversions.
Some networks provide native traffic estimates during campaign setup, while others share inventory figures through account managers. Estimates should reflect the selected GEO, device, and targeting filters rather than combined traffic volumes from multiple advertising formats.
Yes, but support for Gambling or Betting does not guarantee approval of a specific offer. Licensing requirements, target GEO, creatives, and landing pages can affect eligibility. Even approved campaigns may face additional restrictions from individual publishers or traffic partners.
Some networks allow advertisers to whitelist or exclude publishers using site or placement IDs, even when the actual domain names are not disclosed. This allows media buyers to optimize individual traffic sources based on conversion performance.
Yes, FTD data can be used for manual optimization when deposit events are tracked by traffic source. Automated optimization toward FTDs requires a native-compatible bidding system that supports the deposit event as a conversion goal.
Policies vary by network, GEO, and offer category. Some campaigns can use direct links, while others may use advertorials or pre-landers subject to additional review. Approval requirements can apply to the entire funnel, including the creative, intermediate pages, and final destination.
Approval times vary by platform. According to Kadam’s FAQ, internal moderation averages 30 minutes and can reach 60 minutes during busy periods. Kadam starts reviewing campaigns only after the account balance is funded. External SSP/DSP partners may conduct separate reviews, so internal approval does not guarantee immediate access to all placements.

